Claire Sessions Bailey vs Lucinda Gibbs Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Sessions Bailey vs L. Gibbs

Claire Sessions Bailey

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

552

Best Rank

852

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Lucinda Gibbs

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

552

Best Rank

852

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Bailey 1 - 0 Gibbs

They have played 3 sets in total, with Claire Sessions Bailey winning 2 and Lucinda Gibbs winning 1. The last match between Claire Sessions Bailey and Lucinda Gibbs was at the ITF Fayetteville, 14-08-1995, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Claire Sessions Bailey getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Bailey	1
Gibbs	0

Last H2H Matches:

(Q1) ITF Fayetteville(08-14-95)

Stats

Claire Sessions Bailey

Lucinda Gibbs

C. S. Bailey vs L. Gibbs H2H Profile

C. S. Bailey	Stats	L. Gibbs
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
40.68% (24-35)	Career Total W/L	38.46% (5-8)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. S. Bailey vs L. Gibbs Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Claire Sessions Bailey has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Lucinda Gibbs has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Claire Sessions Bailey, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lucinda Gibbs has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Claire Sessions Bailey has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lucinda Gibbs has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Claire Sessions Bailey has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lucinda Gibbs winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Claire Sessions Bailey has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 18/ 26). Lucinda Gibbs has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
Player level: In the last year, Claire Sessions Bailey has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Lucinda Gibbs has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Claire Sessions Bailey winning 1 times and Lucinda Gibbs being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Claire Sessions Bailey winning 2 and Lucinda Gibbs winning 1. The last match between Claire Sessions Bailey and Lucinda Gibbs was at the ITF Fayetteville, 14-08-1995, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Claire Sessions Bailey getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Claire Sessions Bailey has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Lucinda Gibbs has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Claire Sessions Bailey has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lucinda Gibbs has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Claire Sessions Bailey has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lucinda Gibbs has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Claire Sessions Bailey vs Lucinda Gibbs Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. S. Bailey vs L. Gibbs H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. S. Bailey	Stats	L. Gibbs
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	8
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

C. S. Bailey Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Easton 10K - 08-07-1996
R4 Krissy Hamilton HeinbergK. Hamilton	L	6-3 1-6 6-1	Stats
R3 Christine NeumanC. Neuman	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
Williamsburg 10K - 01-07-1996
R3 Stephanie HalsellS. Halsell	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
El Paso 10K - 27-05-1996
R3 Briana HarrisB. Harris	L	6-2 0-6 6-2	Stats
Woodlands 10K - 17-01-1996
R3 Melanie BernardM. Bernard	L	7-5 7-6	Stats

View All

L. Gibbs Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Fayetteville - 14-08-1995
Q1 Claire Sessions BaileyC. Sessions	L	3-6 6-1 6-1	Stats
ITF Norfolk - 03-07-1995
R3 Ying WuY. Wu	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
ITF Nairobi - 27-03-1995
R3 Julie HangerJ. Hanger	L	3-6 7-5 6-1	Stats
ITF Harare - 20-03-1995
R3 Alexandra HenningssonA. Henningsson	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
R4 Michelle MairM. Mair	L	6-4 2-6 6-1	Stats

View All

C. S. Bailey vs L. Gibbs Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. S. Bailey	Stats	L. Gibbs
40.68% (24/35)	YTD Win/Loss	38.46% (5/8)
42.11% (56/77)	Sets Win/Loss	46.88% (15/17)
47.31% (571/636)	Games Win/Loss	48.75% (136/143)
40.91% (18/26)	Hard Win/Loss	38.46% (5/8)
41.67% (5/7)	Clay Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
33.33% (1/2)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
586.49	Average Opponent Rank	584.85
44.23% (23/29)	Challenger W/L	38.46% (5/8)
41% (24/59)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	38% (5/13)
54% (7/13)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/1)
47% (7/15)	Deciding Set Win %	17% (1/6)
82% (22/18)	1st Set Won, Won Match	63% (8/5)
18% (22/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	38% (8/3)
16% (37/6)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (5/0)